Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_C0A9FC11-2110-4203-B7D6-9D78E97CC84F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 06:48:38 -0500
References: <59fd9073.ccc.2048.42f2@land10.nl>
 <B15493A6-B9A6-4622-B7B2-BFA1E2C12754@sharp.fm>
 <af8084bb-0dac-9101-9d9d-b197058f3fc6@wanadoo.fr>
 <CALK=YjP3GkSSW1JBpj-sscvvf4VqY-E1B=Kja8o_QRcvm8jQbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACsi250RKYkAXZP2ineELcX0rDMW30KCHiv=aGnMWMoDubrhug@mail.gmail.com>
 <E51459BF-C68E-4D48-A447-58812B4FC562@jaguNET.com>
 <CACsi252s0f9uGiWepFQC-YCXm7rQ-0cHoCxyez_0i_y2-ncDkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <CACsi252s0f9uGiWepFQC-YCXm7rQ-0cHoCxyez_0i_y2-ncDkw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <B6D99FFC-A012-4908-B487-93AC8B605696@jaguNET.com>
archived-at: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:48:51 -0000


--Apple-Mail=_C0A9FC11-2110-4203-B7D6-9D78E97CC84F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii


> On Nov 5, 2017, at 9:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Nov 5, 2017 12:21, "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jagunet.com =
<mailto:jim@jagunet.com>> wrote:
>=20
> Sorry Bill, but that's not right. trunk is not a "branch" that =
directly leads
> to a releasable branch. Its simply not. It was not intended to
> be. You cannot now claim that any inability, or concern, about
> releasing a RTC "sandbox" somehow implies your conclusion.
>=20
> It has always been so for 2.2.0 and 2.4.0. You are shifting =
perspective and demonstrably were entirely engaged in every prior =
version-minor discussion.
>=20

Because they were/are direct-to-release branches. trunk is not.


--Apple-Mail=_C0A9FC11-2110-4203-B7D6-9D78E97CC84F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=us-ascii

<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 5, 2017, at 9:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr &lt;<a href="mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net" class="">wrowe@rowe-clan.net</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="auto" class=""><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 5, 2017 12:21, "Jim Jagielski" &lt;<a href="mailto:jim@jagunet.com" class="">jim@jagunet.com</a>&gt; wrote:<blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="quoted-text">
<br class="">
</div>Sorry Bill, but that's not right. trunk is not a "branch" that directly leads<br class="">
to a releasable branch. Its simply not. It was not intended to<br class="">
be. You cannot now claim that any inability, or concern, about<br class="">
releasing a RTC "sandbox" somehow implies your conclusion.</blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">It has always been so for 2.2.0 and 2.4.0. You are shifting perspective and demonstrably were entirely engaged in every prior version-minor discussion.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div></div>
</div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Because they were/are direct-to-release branches. trunk is not.</div><br class=""></body></html>
--Apple-Mail=_C0A9FC11-2110-4203-B7D6-9D78E97CC84F--