Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tagging 2.4.29 / 2.5.0-{alpha/beta?} today
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <CACsi253tht5fJO3Vtr33OzsjHHeMdg-FPvgO6nQBNyLJON0w2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <52D25D9D-347F-4C79-800A-8CC0372BE005@greenbytes.de>
 <CACsi252JZVdc7Oj2O2F7pX=XcAp8R940VuXFkkX0xPiqjeJ3bQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Message-ID: <44e40cdf-0d21-a25b-5a45-6521777c3be3@thelounge.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:10:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACsi252JZVdc7Oj2O2F7pX=XcAp8R940VuXFkkX0xPiqjeJ3bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: de-CH
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:11:01 -0000


Am 13.10.2017 um 17:05 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
> On Oct 13, 2017 08:41, "Stefan Eissing" <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de 
> <mailto:stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>> wrote:
> 
>      > Am 13.10.2017 um 15:19 schrieb William A Rowe Jr
>     <wrowe@rowe-clan.net <mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net>>:
>      >
>      > Is anyone seeing an issue of concern about stability on 2.4.x branch?
> 
>     Not any more than in previous releases, I think.
> 
>      > Has anyone else looked at Jim's proposed fixes for xcode 9 building
>      > under maintainer mode? A couple-line quick fix to configure.in
>     <http://configure.in>, that
>      > anyone on OS/X should be able to validate in minutes. The same fix
>      > is already present on APR's branches, which I will tag as well.
> 
>     I build in maintainer mode all the time and use Xcode9 since I
>     upgrade to macOS 10.13. Whatever weirdness I encountered and reported
>     earlier is gone - I rebuilt my local 2.4.x environment and all seems
>     well.
> 
> I suspect it works because you first configured APR in maintainer mode, 
> and httpd inherits cpp flags?

and why does that happen at all for apr-util and httpd?

that means *you can not* build rpm packages for let say sandybridge on a 
machine which has installed apr/apr-util built with -mtune=native on a 
Skylake cluster until you first rebuild apr/apr-util which then means 
you can't build a httpd package optimized for Skylake until you rebuild 
the other both again - that is simply wrong and no other software acts 
that way

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61417
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61418