httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>
Subject AW: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)
Date Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:34:15 GMT
+1

Regards

Rüdiger

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic.dev@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2017 10:31
> An: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)
> 
> I like this "attic" idea better, resurrecting something is easier if
> you can find that it ever existed (w/o diving into svn history, à la
> "svn delete").
> 
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Stefan Eissing
> <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> > Thanks Greg. The proposed change is purely aestetic. You could make a
> > dir /branches/attic" and move all candidates there. People wanting to
> > "resurrect" them can simply move them back. This is not RCS.
> >
> >> Am 25.10.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> To be clear: "delete" simply means "no longer seen in HEAD". This is
> version control. The data cannot truly be deleted, so it can always be
> revived. Or reviewed.
> >>
> >> On Oct 25, 2017 12:31, "Marion & Christophe JAILLET"
> <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> >> Just to mention that before giving a +1, I made a copy of these
> repositories in order to dig later on, in order to see if something
> useful seems to be there.
> >> Don't have that much time these days to play with httpd, but will do
> and will report anything that looks valuable.
> >>
> >> CJ
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 25/10/2017 à 14:29, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
> >> Are there anything of "value" in any of those branches?
> >>
> >> If not, prune away!
> >>
> >> On Oct 24, 2017, at 9:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote:
> >>
> >> Can someone clean up the not needed anymore  backports/branches
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/
> >>
> >> httpd 2.4.1 was tagged at r1243503.
> >>
> >> I'd propose we start by pruning all working branches not updated
> since this tag.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >
Mime
View raw message