httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA
Date Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:51:50 GMT
If the issue is "real" and a patch is forthcoming, I agree that we
mark 2.4.28 as DOA and proceed w/ 2.4.29 next week. I am comfortable keeping
the VOTE open longer that the normal/required 72hours to be sure one way
or another.

Personally, I don't think the age or heritage of the build-logic is the issue,
but rather a lack of people *really* testing 2.4.x until a release is tagged.
It's for that reason that I tend to pre-announce a T&R well in advance of actually
DOING the T&R so that people can test HEAD in hopes that the tag will already
have had some good testing beforehand.

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:21 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> 
> The assert() has me concerned, and Steffen's report is problematic. He has a vote but
hasn't cast it. At this moment I'm -0 and would spin a 2.4.29 next week to address these issues,
unless you decide to respin before this release, yourself.
> 
> Nothing I've changed today altered the httpd tarball significantly. Studying Steffen's
report next, along with some apparently missing glue for brotli.
> 
> My solution is going to be radical, shove every last d*mned modules/foo into the /I path
includes list so this can't happen again during 2.4, and hopefully not until 20 year old build
logic is discarded. One less thing to worry about or pre-review when RM's loudly announce
an upcoming tag.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 25, 2017 07:13, "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place:
> 
>         http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> 
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> 
> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
> 
> Thx!


Mime
View raw message