Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4079B200CCC for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3EC3616C7F4; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8384E16C70F for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:54:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 5887 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2017 14:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5877 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2017 14:54:13 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:54:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 045D0C00CE for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:54:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.379 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qjc0cpCS549B for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A18E85FCB0 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id p188so53793163oia.0 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 07:54:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RBIatvMm0/k+VPL5zqX97fwC6ObTl/+7d5HJTc78i0Y=; b=BtCFymdy+0Skb6U5dO+hKWkZMtQHxN9iVVDxa30EfceOknTquWvYciTptMVyILbUeU 4vFR49+XxtVobdEl5W7S1F8vLYw6hcjqpoh6qHxPM7nISuPAlXCMCO27vxtvt+AiES9r TUI+VP6D4TmYRv2wBH9IA65APVmvUHyygzVIAAHyxMtVKQroWgp55g1KWLM/tUr4sv+w tvFf8hi1JWanr+clhyJVS0jw/jWZfBaSkZVpXOaGggUySfSVYggE7a+iFjX/sDGmBvnI K4wD3DF+G8Of44yuDaGf/a4xnwlfcLLTuUrsxwT/ACmupJ/39lFfX1RagNq/d3Xm4clc gopA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=RBIatvMm0/k+VPL5zqX97fwC6ObTl/+7d5HJTc78i0Y=; b=t5KxUIkeAmBEgT7SdhpzVT+gbgECjI0dfY9+PQyzlEU8eA02gnup58YxC3ba5/r3DT cnWAwMAVTbToXH74E1/X2ywYt+mZJ/sipSenPpnIdTM2abKN/uuZoPNxutYQZxCnHRB0 CvaDSMom4+McP+v1j+8cnYY83wLLzQ4KAbDvDW2hPiL35uaonWfL5TM4REyt17pItEuu L6qK0cfMB37hhcXtyAXRrUOuOICt3Y7qwOAxuF+1pdjxhCdA+28j7k7V2BDEVpWK+ZYJ oQJvYZJ/6n1ZKwnOD1fqvJfdj6VEW8vs9388DX8cOTgjQeY89MYfW8VtQfFUkYZ2wI+6 aEIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113banVlSwPRtBpDCycr5NJUoYHCAEmSETM+uTKq/KC+kQimg+Jk nGsSO2m4iALVGWhN3oog1ujRf/DveLeL X-Received: by 10.202.208.144 with SMTP id j16mr967964oiy.82.1500648849956; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 07:54:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.45.22 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 07:54:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eric Covener Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:54:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug 60956] Event MPM listener thread may get blocked by SSL shutdowns To: Apache HTTP Server Development List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" archived-at: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:54:20 -0000 > Also, it seems that in the deferred lingering case we should probaly > shorten the socket timeout before calling (and possibly blocking on) > ap_start_lingering_close()'s hooks/flush, since we likely come from a > time-up already... +1