Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1800306 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES
 modules/mappers/mod_actions.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:37:52 -0400
References: <20170629174350.5CD573A060B@svn01-us-west.apache.org>
 <4599A1BB-F372-4251-AD75-A8BCA9ADB723@jaguNET.com>
 <1a701421-80de-49ef-8f8d-fec3870e0173@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <1a701421-80de-49ef-8f8d-fec3870e0173@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <FDE20269-B8C5-4ADA-A532-5FCC696CC124@jaguNET.com>
archived-at: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:38:00 -0000

Well, in 2.4.26 is WAS/IS an entry in notes available to modules,
and since we don't know who/what may not being using or expecting
it, and since it's useful info anyway and not a performance hit,
it seems "prudent" to me. But I'm fine either way.

> On Jun 30, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Jacob Champion <champion.p@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On 06/30/2017 05:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I still think that the below has value and should not be/have-been
>> reverted.
>=20
> I'm not arguing that it doesn't have value in theory, but IMO it =
doesn't belong in 2.4.x without a client. Right now it's just dead code.
>=20
>> Anyone opposed to me re-adding it to trunk and removing it
>> from the backport proposal?
>=20
> Yes. Unless you have a use case for it at this moment, I'd prefer that =
it be re-backported if and when that use case materializes, but I will =
defer to the majority here.
>=20
> --Jacob