Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALK=YjPaN3xqDC0tB5AJKXPbP20NfFU06DZJORQbNmLVph0SpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D1D59C41-B659-430E-9C5F-989BAD8FAECA@jaguNET.com> <CALK=YjPaN3xqDC0tB5AJKXPbP20NfFU06DZJORQbNmLVph0SpA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yann Ylavic <ylavic.dev@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 00:24:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKQ1sVMAU5Sams7pfG-k-BvKXcjgmqnUX5M=_bwPeLjJ1WDQWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 and no-longer "experimental"
To: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
archived-at: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 22:24:58 -0000

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> There was discussion some time ago about dropping the "experimental"
>> tag from our HTTP/2 implementation. It is causing loads of people
>> to not use it, as well as allowing for the perpetuation of FUD that
>> httpd really doesn't support HTTP/2.
>>
>> I'd like for 2.4.26 to be the release that removes that tag. It
>> implies a transition to RTC in 2.4 for it, but I think that that
>> is workable and realistic at this point...
>>
>> Thoughts? Comments?
>
> I think we should drop the experimental label/treatment. If not now,
> it seems like it's effectively permanent in 2.4.

+1