Return-Path: <dev-return-89587-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@httpd.apache.org>
X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183])
	by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF815200C8E
	for <archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io>; Thu,  8 Jun 2017 19:30:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix)
	id AE1B3160BD5; Thu,  8 Jun 2017 17:30:13 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 006A0160BC3
	for <archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io>; Thu,  8 Jun 2017 19:30:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 27504 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2017 17:30:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 27494 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2017 17:30:11 -0000
Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 17:30:11 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 85874C220B
	for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Thu,  8 Jun 2017 17:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.299
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id eLTVy8VmSbnm for <dev@httpd.apache.org>;
	Thu,  8 Jun 2017 17:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from s6.mail.rcig.net (s6.mail.rcig.net [216.87.38.206])
	by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0ED3A5F30B
	for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Thu,  8 Jun 2017 17:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mobile-166-175-62-185.mycingular.net ([166.175.62.185]:48734 helo=[10.49.141.227])
	by s6.mail.rcig.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <druggeri@primary.net>)
	id 1dJ1Fx-0003ot-Ek
	for dev@httpd.apache.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:30:03 -0500
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:30:00 -0500
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----4XHO3V6L8RD4ZAY4C39ADXJD8PMNQ7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: An ask for eyes on proposal
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: Daniel Ruggeri <druggeri@primary.net>
Message-ID: <4FC3745F-8FEB-442B-B3D8-57A48D05DCA7@primary.net>
X-ACL-Warn: X-The email account used to send this email was: druggeri@primary.net
archived-at: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 17:30:13 -0000

------4XHO3V6L8RD4ZAY4C39ADXJD8PMNQ7
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, all;
   With the proposal to T&R set for Monday, I wanted to draw attention to =
the PROXY protocol proposal in STATUS=2E Just hoping for a quick review=2E =
I know it appears to be a large change, but as I worked through the feedbac=
k, ten of the commits effectively got coded out=2E What we are left with is=
 essentially just the donated code + safety around IPv6 + the ability to de=
signate subnets that do not get PROXY processing=2E

   This code has been around a while and I think it would be nice if we co=
uld incorporate the donated code in the first release since being donated=
=2E

Cheers
--=20
Daniel Ruggeri
------4XHO3V6L8RD4ZAY4C39ADXJD8PMNQ7
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, all;<br>
   With the proposal to T&amp;R set for Monday, I wanted to draw attention=
 to the PROXY protocol proposal in STATUS=2E Just hoping for a quick review=
=2E I know it appears to be a large change, but as I worked through the fee=
dback, ten of the commits effectively got coded out=2E What we are left wit=
h is essentially just the donated code + safety around IPv6 + the ability t=
o designate subnets that do not get PROXY processing=2E<br>
<br>
   This code has been around a while and I think it would be nice if we co=
uld incorporate the donated code in the first release since being donated=
=2E<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
-- <br>
Daniel Ruggeri
------4XHO3V6L8RD4ZAY4C39ADXJD8PMNQ7--