httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steffen" <i...@apachelounge.com>
Subject Re: The drive for 2.4.26
Date Mon, 01 May 2017 11:37:53 GMT
No mod_session_crypto with apr & apr-util 1.5 and Openssl 1.1.0, error in 
Apr:

Error    C2079    'cipherCtx' uses undefined struct 'evp_cipher_ctx_st' 
apr_crypto_openssl 
C:\VC15\Win32\httpd-2.4.26\srclib\apr-util\crypto\apr_crypto_openssl.c    67

With apr & apr-util 1.6 all fine.


-----Original Message----- 
From: Gregg Smith
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 12:53 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: The drive for 2.4.26

Yes, and only with the legacy build and then only with the IDE. Those
files are static. If you build at the command line it should "just work."

When I built with apr 1.5 however apr_crypto_openssl would not build
with openssl 1.1.0. I cannot see how that has changed..

On 4/29/2017 1:42 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Is this a Windows issue? I built with 1.1.0e on MacOS and apr 1.5 and saw 
> no problems.
>
>> Am 28.04.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Steffen <info@apachelounge.com>:
>>
>> I doubt now. It was based on a note in cvtdsp.pl.
>>
>> Maybe it is only a .dsp and xml change, which I can apply to 1.5.
>>
>> Maybe Gregg can shed some light on this ?
>>
>>
>>> Op 28 apr. 2017 om 22:16 heeft William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>

>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>> Now that these are independent of one another, I think we can release 
>>> before 1.6.x are released. We should just call out "New: OpenSSL 1.1.0 
>>> support! (Upcoming APR 1.6.x is required for this support.)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Apr 28, 2017 2:56 PM, "Steffen" <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>>> When with apr & apr-until 1.6 fine even more cooler.  Otherwise OpenSSL

>>>> 1.1 not supported.
>>>>
>>>> For OpenSSL 1.1 we need apr & apr-util 1.6 to build (e.g 
>>>> apr_crypto_openssl for mod_session crypto)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Op 28 apr. 2017 om 14:14 heeft Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
het 
>>>>> volgende geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be cool to have 2.4.26 released by ApacheCon, or even
>>>>> by OSCON. There are, last I checked, 2 showstoppers on list for
>>>>> 2.4.26... Anyway we could address them and shoot for a T&R maybe
>>>>> next Weds?
>>>>
> 


Mime
View raw message