Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C727D200C5A for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:13:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C5B46160BA1; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FF40160B90 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:13:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 36119 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2017 08:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36110 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2017 08:13:43 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:13:43 +0000 Received: from gauss.localdomain (unknown [86.111.157.220]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id B16931A0372 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gauss.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018A92D9 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:13:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: drop experimental from http2 for 2.4.next? To: dev@httpd.apache.org References: <1492301747.28737.30.camel@mimir.webthing.com> From: Ruediger Pluem Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:13:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1492301747.28737.30.camel@mimir.webthing.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit archived-at: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:13:46 -0000 On 04/16/2017 02:15 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 17:02 -0400, Eric Covener wrote: >> Hi everyone, shall we drop experimental from mod_http2 for 2.4.next? >> >> We could drop it and keep CTR. >> > Why would it be good for a stable (i.e. non-experimental) > component of httpd to have an entirely different commit > policy to the project as a whole? Surely the CTR is in > recognition of its experimental status, to lubricate the > process of hacking it into shape. > I am with Nick here. It is either or. If we remove the experimental tag it should be RTC. Given that I would like to keep it experimental for some time. Regards RĂ¼diger