Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCB7200C5C for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:31:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id EC46E160B9F; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F7F4160B91 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:31:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 98410 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2017 14:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98399 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2017 14:31:31 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:31:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D5841C66C3 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:31:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.98 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0e2joaIV7LA4 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fed1rmfepo202.cox.net (fed1rmfepo202.cox.net [68.230.241.147]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8FAB35F39D for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fed1rmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.173]) by fed1rmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.28 201-2260-151-171-20160122) with ESMTP id <20170420143121.YQPM26070.fed1rmfepo202.cox.net@fed1rmimpo305.cox.net> for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:31:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([98.176.34.113]) by fed1rmimpo305.cox.net with cox id AeXL1v0062STVfm01eXLvd; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:31:21 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A090205.58F8C639.007F,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=VNZ9547X c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8xCO7h6kmYZdHn5tUOQhsw==:117 a=8xCO7h6kmYZdHn5tUOQhsw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=eAAL1In8AAAA:8 a=eZYLnUQvEkUjbBybNGgA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=4lVBv0vQXCRuozHsR40P:22 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=port88gs@cox.net Subject: Re: The drive for 2.4.26 To: dev@httpd.apache.org References: <9DBD162B-7B95-44CE-B1BE-D7D949C4A358@jaguNET.com> <360909DD-30C0-4410-90EB-9D1AD42008F0@jaguNET.com> <0E1094ED-2F26-4519-9697-EA3CEDDCCFD3@greenbytes.de> From: Gregg Smith Message-ID: <70473b1c-0acb-ab83-0de0-4c9c2bcd6c8d@gknw.net> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:31:17 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:31:33 -0000 ABS doesn't work with openssl 1.1.0, on windows anyway. It builds without warning yet doesn't work. abs https://www.domain.com just sits there forever and never completes or shows anything. I cannot imagine this being a windows only problem. On 4/20/2017 3:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > We are very, very close to being in a releasable state... looks > like just 1 show-stopper. If we also want to wait until APR 1.6 > is released, we can also look at having redis/memcached parity in > socache as well, which would be good for 2.4.26... > > Thoughts? > > PS: it would be great to have this out by ApacheCon next month. >