Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152A6200C64 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:51:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 13A6B160BB8; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AB6B160B95 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:51:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 85232 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2017 20:51:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 85222 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2017 20:51:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:51:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E156E1AFA46 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:51:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.379 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EAkD9xCWWOHc for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg0-f52.google.com (mail-pg0-f52.google.com [74.125.83.52]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E951C5F36C for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id y4so14850351pge.0 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:51:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9q2+Qigoo11HOQJ8yRDs9V5S9cj+jW9+sHf8CNEl+lk=; b=NoIsBth29rjN+ZbX04+v2DjZLwpsdw0mcy1fdDFlJGorVOFC7pfT6yzdx6liD+ZnBw c3F+4qm2udSan3mbrYwgIoUeud5GUgtVAKHTmweGvKrlqStwuUd68N45dPz35Amx4RUk a3M7szb/sWy2ATCOXB+YOL3olOq79tMZnYigV1PDTm1Aqh92CRCd/Tn42r5mx+OYI0uU RWxWa+1RkdoH/1z6DzkCfy2wY2BGGPn14VMZoUpybtpJRpww+BUZh/oh9v6+Ja509rGj 3BV5RUywxxIryKRvL2SkCmfDEOW/XXLTO6ua3t4V7bewkESzd8pg6YZZRd0U7t2pwWfO N9KQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9q2+Qigoo11HOQJ8yRDs9V5S9cj+jW9+sHf8CNEl+lk=; b=fohpD+TN4FZdvA+YnUy5LjBFZhvjLwqyfpr2lWEVQbrdG48bWSc4Mn2HoFDRvTqaV5 C1r48obIKMAQ+8IWvUapAwLJMvElazlAKRZSRAgCnl37UjAsMeWxhhuekMiZ2PY7uuX4 FNZx8fsjSi2PXz4yOIdxLHKo90ghBFMd9Ek+4zATf27AFHVT9evq2CJR1NzW1qctQYvg BpWmQuHJCW0YlvntM93SfkQqJnru8610AFwpGdqYZYLYP/+MMuysgHfy1Ee3BPDuMINd HRCRDpelt7uvg6LiALh/RtcUrXsjL5Z7vC4NOl7lFpOEOsN0G237jujNgq/uAvLeL8dQ DhfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6t1G8Kd4Vu1O/lquJsvNsDt2goDQGZTTFPYVF9nlydmG23MeRe azu/tMUOjYrIBy7s7yw= X-Received: by 10.98.194.69 with SMTP id l66mr14349074pfg.55.1493412661076; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (50-39-112-180.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.39.112.180]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o23sm11674145pfi.100.2017.04.28.13.50.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c To: dev@httpd.apache.org References: <20151006163053.95FFE3A0141@svn01-us-west.apache.org> <80b43623-b6f5-88a2-f455-fedb6fff5b14@gmail.com> <9f51335d-ac33-1fd6-a2f5-42939e9b8464@gmail.com> <7A9BA992-18AB-4169-B6F7-74C91365A635@greenbytes.de> From: Jacob Champion Message-ID: <3aefe09d-e6d3-1559-696b-025bdb897625@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:50:59 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:51:08 -0000 On 04/27/2017 02:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Jacob, does it work better? Unfortunately not; now we have crashes in mod_case_filter. If you're having trouble reproducing a crash, try using an APR with pool debugging enabled. The poisoned-on-free memory is showing up really nicely. I ask again, though... ;D ...why does the EOR bucket have memory ownership of a request_rec, especially when its lifetime is not well defined? And why have we put business logic into a finalizer? This is ringing all of my memory management alarm bells. --Jacob