httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William A Rowe Jr <>
Subject Re: SHA-256
Date Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:40:01 GMT
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek
<> wrote:
> On 2017-02-24 23:45, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> We provide .asc pgp signatures exclusively for that purpose.
> I agree, gpg is the only way to check the authenticity of a file.
> However, people who use hashes to do this (for reasons I previously
> mentioned) are in a lot safer spot, because it's most likely impossible
> for an adversary to create a collision.

There is no need to generate a collision.

If fools users into thinking the .sha256 files on their
site are legitimate, or if there is an MITM DNS spoof of,
the faux-httpd-2.4.25.tar.gz.sha256 file is simply replaced with a hash
result that matches the file.

Our official downloads.html page links
files for all PGP sigs and hashes, but that presumes the user steps
through the website in the typical way.

"People who use hashes to do this" are not doing themselves favors.

View raw message