Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B8B200C02 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:14:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D0446160B42; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 23:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2541D160B33 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:14:42 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 8808 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2017 23:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8798 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2017 23:14:37 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 23:14:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9880EC03A0 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 23:14:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.321 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.321 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VsKl01yzc4yr for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 23:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f175.google.com (mail-qt0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 31BFE5F1B8 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 23:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c47so533319372qtc.2 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:14:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hcCu9DOOLKWgtbKqQSvfCT4yYHMvraxsxy6li2mjQPw=; b=qW4G9FUnzX2EFJxdIifbnQKBDkpAouDmUhYaUyeKqTjBpXrAbpRKJAsY7sI1akXcj7 MTmI0Qvww4vJJPg1oWrPn9OzBWvK3+52sCBGmM5JjTj9v9H9wVfVGsGH6Z2iviiuIKbj t89HP9ibW+rhoGUd0H+1wqubfxbu9YVb2gnE8SZ83gzybO8Qmd6hI2HQpeRKTkuMtPcj dy++4xtm9/NfkByh26M5R7E4Fahn2u8ZpirJJJHeICC7ZPuDedmxaHf1DD41zeuRcEts K834uvHuAjlNxWURZ7/MaQTiEdyPgWTESB5LtsRM6YsMcSBImoE3a4Fcw252FM2qgCME DDgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hcCu9DOOLKWgtbKqQSvfCT4yYHMvraxsxy6li2mjQPw=; b=o05q92Uzn2wFjTFvv8xFVI9I9aIJ1RuZmjVO25SThGCNbpNfXENKi1B7Hj1PAkGgfJ jYTolEikFAJCUNlNSbzeEevo+tuvpukdcLV1Tm1/SRIuvh+odDvN8V0jtfCr7WTZWYiv hejHuQi/c/SrJB+gDMLY1ur4l/EGhfGSMAfeDN9+Enitv6oKjdJJBL3VpTdG3mae4IAb 1lcnm9qESAz63xSsFTnlNfUi5+2/IKaC3gTWAgFBLhQyV9N8oFA8D1uau9KxPIttwa+A 7CnL6dCSwhuHO56mE6ksNnzFAVXZH41HW7xjTszOAx2OnT5AKPwL7wUWRnVuLV8VXdnR ykLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLl69i3DFqfSMxNvSsnCIoJXuGr7jmS8e1/IWbnTH/JhozSbmiuCDTnokvPzVJkKLHTQQoRHtSqzPLlWQ== X-Received: by 10.200.57.71 with SMTP id t7mr75519324qtb.59.1483658074074; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:14:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.177.66 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:14:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20170105123149.2C22D3A0252@svn01-us-west.apache.org> From: Yann Ylavic Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:14:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r1777460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c To: httpd-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 23:14:44 -0000 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > But if any of you fears a possible regression for older 2.2.x apps (I > see now that Eric included a test, I personnaly tested it this > afternoon with a custom integration suite too), I'm happy to propose > and vote it. FWIW, proposed in STATUS for both to 2.2 and 2.4.