Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACsi250U3LPaJy0hazLH85LgChOJwFCv831a=YtXizgoJOp_BA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170105123149.2C22D3A0252@svn01-us-west.apache.org>
 <CALK=YjNLUen=dJDXk=8Cmv4oMTzzPOb2=cx=VXtbrGscwDVbtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACsi250U3LPaJy0hazLH85LgChOJwFCv831a=YtXizgoJOp_BA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yann Ylavic <ylavic.dev@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 23:42:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKQ1sVNOyETEbA+NteJx8bNMvsf47MT4STbsj_2bHgww+LGA2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1777460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c
To: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:43:06 -0000

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do we want this for the 2.2 release?
>
> I don't feel strongly about this.
>
> It is such an unusual edge case (I believe Yann pointed out it was a custom
> module he was working around) that it should rarely be seen in the wild.
>
> I'd be fine if we want to accelerate this into 2.2.32, or get 2.2.32
> out and then
> backport to have the patch available for the very few who are impacted.

Agreed, I wouldn't push it, and can live with a my own patching.
Possibly another module/cgi uses that CRLF to LWS trick though, but
not that I'm aware of so..