Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57983200BF1 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:13:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 563F2160B43; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FF6E160B33 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:13:36 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 6557 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2017 14:13:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 6547 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2017 14:13:35 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:13:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1AC60C0C32 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:13:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.78 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.78 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rowe-clan-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PKIn-deGOl9l for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (mail-it0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 701D15F5C6 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id o141so276259620itc.0 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 06:13:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rowe-clan-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/L3TRM95Z4ulRtFkyokuiZjCHuqPPQ+CtlsjdEXxbaY=; b=YYjpEUSAGBbjDzBcZaOG1wJKPD21IkYNh74TUxWpqR0FQjG6peTuUVgazeNDG6o3Yd yHq06KcALUPqsjAKI69hs+k5tYRz90s7mCocRzOfYq5hXIfLBNr0vltg5r+N95x4D3ts ZKfYnvMo80wuV4GCqxDA0RFtwIcRQJct20MD6QAUpmAd6tmiiiUpEg6cj2IgnuqzAVhL 03bo9GFtgOuNopnnM4yE5MPZpJfIrF4uAPXf5wUUtOqohjr48hjP8UfqWcjpEJw87iWW TwTpDGk8r5Z0gRhJ2iD2Icc3f8ycprajzQiEtMnTGNLpC2xtJpyTkJ9MNXpvQb4CToPL 9U9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=/L3TRM95Z4ulRtFkyokuiZjCHuqPPQ+CtlsjdEXxbaY=; b=pj810IutRpATGj6HCbOZ2oVm5sED0VccLzXvzdJQdmBonRT/zxKX+PPc0V/k5OsM+h dpxbPRb4/MOjC8/4IgHn8uza/A2tKxpuOdVrHmsMHZzhJ3YrmMzhKIJZVltkU/HwtgvV H2aJVxzAivbKLGclx2KM1oCeJ7joujRy0kVA7rGRXoF1DQ/phL3zZRi36+jsAwCzNcX1 A51QuxvWkHB3b4Cg+v4RUnroqepFhkQvpyC10dO7VWXGC5icCA6c8QqrToKpihQnb51v LnQb5SqpHLzt8rN6Z1jzIvHW5u1O62doKJOcrskumJ2p+0PI2DMZOwArcSdb6LcEvd+O O9uA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKiqL95q2Bt50NZfM/0/GDst1nRbfgOA3fppnG52Qguwuh2yx8yyucMqK+ci7ufoQikrmZLSGRlFKqqXLYK X-Received: by 10.36.101.5 with SMTP id u5mr52660362itb.45.1483452811780; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 06:13:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.160.1 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 06:13:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.160.1 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 06:13:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5F918D08-D2D2-4972-BABA-55C61335F588@jaguNET.com> References: <3bfc30ff-ecd5-b7c5-16d8-caad8a9a9746@primary.net> <6a5cb93375ab490ba2db4e5073f5838e@DC03PXMBP003.jacksonnational.com> <5F918D08-D2D2-4972-BABA-55C61335F588@jaguNET.com> From: William A Rowe Jr Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 08:13:31 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: The Version Bump fallacy [Was Re: Post 2.4.25] To: httpd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143e812e33d170545314526 archived-at: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:13:37 -0000 --001a1143e812e33d170545314526 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jan 3, 2017 07:11, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: Back in the "old days" we used to provide complimentary builds for some OSs... I'm not saying we go back and do that necessarily, but maybe also providing easily consumable other formats when we do a release, as a "service" to the community might make a lot of sense. It could be really helpful. Or we can follow svn's lead and hand it entirely off to the broader community, which proved really effective on Windows, given the number of distros to now choose between. I haven't seen similar for RHEL users, for example. That said, only one major Linux distro (April Ubuntu LTS) is at OpenSSL 1.0.2, which is a necessary part of http/2's special sauce. --001a1143e812e33d170545314526 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Jan 3, 2017 07:11, "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
Back in the "old days" we used to provide comp= limentary builds
for some OSs... I'm not saying we go back and do that necessarily,
but maybe also providing easily consumable other formats when we
do a release, as a "service" to the community might make a lot of sense.

= It could be really helpful. Or we can follow svn's lead and hand it ent= irely off to the broader community, which proved really effective on Window= s, given the number of distros to now choose between. I haven't seen si= milar for RHEL users, for example.

That said, only one = major Linux distro (April Ubuntu LTS) is at OpenSSL 1.0.2, which is a neces= sary part of http/2's special sauce.
--001a1143e812e33d170545314526--