Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: JSON for mod_status
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:56:37 +0100
References: <128EB450-7EF2-44CD-9D0A-9B1AA913AC2F@jaguNET.com>
 <CAFedD40ZbPPQr9PUDce1tnfYTqhwBmJBQzhZHT_O2CL00zWs2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <99BF9CB8-3BA7-4685-B0A2-5ED3FB6CD728@jaguNET.com>
 <091a712a-6f07-51d2-e8bc-ee8bb973d84e@apache.org>
 <1329F46A-CD2B-4279-B4AA-8BB5F5F1065B@jaguNET.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <1329F46A-CD2B-4279-B4AA-8BB5F5F1065B@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <A353846F-33A3-4CB2-AA5F-A7D65A85275E@greenbytes.de>
archived-at: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:56:46 -0000

Nice!

> Am 18.01.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>:
>=20
> This is too awesome for words :)
>=20
>> On Jan 18, 2017, at 4:56 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbedooh@apache.org> =
wrote:
>>=20
>> On 01/17/2017 07:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> It all depends on what Bill decides regarding mod_bmx and if
>>> it is something we intent to backport to 2.4.x
>>>=20
>>> Still not sure on how to *use* BMX, or how other modules
>>> "hook in" (right now we have several modules hook into
>>> mod_status so the "how" is well known and documented), so
>>> I would require some sort of docs in addition to the actual
>>> code, of course.
>>=20
>> Some JFDI in the meantime; https://httpd.apache.org/server-status :)
>> JSON: http://httpd.apache.org/server-status?view=3Djson_status
>>=20
>> With regards,
>> Daniel.
>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> On Jan 17, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Luca Toscano <toscano.luca@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> 2016-11-30 18:54 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com>:
>>>> I'm thinking about adding JSON support to mod_status...
>>>> the "plain" version output really stinks and lacks parity
>>>> w/ the info we provide via HTML, and it would be nice
>>>> to produce a really easily parseable format.
>>>>=20
>>>> Thoughts...?
>>>>=20
>>>> I know it was extensively discussed, but do we have an agreement =
about a plan to add this feature?  :)
>>>>=20
>>>> Luca
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>=20

Stefan Eissing

<green/>bytes GmbH
Hafenstrasse 16
48155 M=C3=BCnster
www.greenbytes.de