Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F3C200BEA for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 02:44:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C89E3160B2A; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 01:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EE67160B22 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 02:44:00 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 18598 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2016 01:44:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18584 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2016 01:44:00 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 01:44:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CC7B9185F0E for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 01:43:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3WLcHJh2RqHp for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 01:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s1.mail.rcig.net (s1.mail.rcig.net [216.87.38.201]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B4CA661006 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 01:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 23-117-14-203.lightspeed.stlsmo.sbcglobal.net ([23.117.14.203]:49528 helo=[192.168.0.2]) by s1.mail.rcig.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1cGc8E-0005SU-2x for dev@httpd.apache.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:43:52 -0600 Subject: Re: T&R of 2.4.24 To: dev@httpd.apache.org References: From: Daniel Ruggeri Message-ID: <6bdf7d0f-37e3-aed9-fcd6-167189880c8f@primary.net> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:43:38 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: X-The email account used to send this email was: druggeri@primary.net archived-at: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 01:44:02 -0000 On 12/12/2016 12:26 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > In spite of 34 registered project committee members, until other > contributors come forward to participate in the security patch review > process, we may simply have to declare all further efforts are currently > on pause. Does one have to be on PMC to review security patches? If not, can you give me a general idea on volume? This would be something I think $dayjob would be OK with me doing as part of keeping a shirt on my back and roof over the childrens' heads ;-) -- Daniel Ruggeri