httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1776076 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_protocol.xml modules/filters/mod_proxy_protocol.c
Date Mon, 26 Dec 2016 23:35:59 GMT
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:42 PM,  <jim@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Mon Dec 26 21:42:26 2016
> New Revision: 1776076
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1776076&view=rev
> Log:
> revert back... no conflict w/ name

I think I'd prefer another name than "ProxyProtocol" (on/off...), still.
It may be misleading wrt to named protocols we may handle later for
things like Upgrade forwarding or ALPN on the backend side (even if
we'll/d use something like ProxyUpgradeProtocols or ProxyALPNProtocols
then, booking the simple/generic ProxyProtocol name by now is not
evolutive enough, IMHO).

How about "ProxyProtocolLine on/off"?

Mime
View raw message