httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: The Version Bump fallacy [Was Re: Post 2.4.25]
Date Wed, 28 Dec 2016 22:49:59 GMT
Hi Jim,

Talk to Google and the OpenOffice Team, that was a paste from OpenOffice
Calc.

I'll be happy to start summarizing as a shared Google sheet.

Cheers,

Bill


On Dec 28, 2016 14:22, "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:

> Bill, I don't know if it's just my Email client or not (doesn't
> look like it) but could you fix your Email client? It's impossible to
> reply and have the quoted parts parsed out correctly. I think
> it's to do w/ your messages being RTF or something.
>
> Thx!
>
> Included is an example of how a Reply misses quote levels...
>
> > On Dec 28, 2016, at 1:34 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > cPanel too... They are moving to EA4 which is Apache 2.4.
> >
> > If not moved yet, that example wouldn't be helpful, it reinforces my
> point
> > four years later. But EA itself seems to track pretty closely to the most
> > contemperanious versions, looks like within a month.
> >
> >
> > So the idea that supplemental (ie: 2.4.x->2.4.y) patches don't
> > have the reach or range of larger ones (2.4.x->2.6/3.0) isn't
> > quite accurate.
> >
> > It's entirely accurate. It isn't all-encompassing. We have that data too,
> > let's tear down SecuritySpace's Nov '16 dataset;
> > http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/201611/servers.html
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message