Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: apreq release
To: Steve Hay <steve.m.hay@googlemail.com>, dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <86dca07b-40f1-475e-4c96-89e808fbdb03@beamartyr.net>
 <CADED=K77Lmdzqy2oc1ks7ivVOdma-tj1s9s=u9402DYcVb05qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org, dev@perl.apache.org
From: Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net>
Message-ID: <a9535fa0-cefd-1eca-8c79-921427130205@beamartyr.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:05:46 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADED=K77Lmdzqy2oc1ks7ivVOdma-tj1s9s=u9402DYcVb05qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:05:56 -0000

That was my knee-jerk reaction, too, but after digging, I saw that win32
really shouldn't be affected.

On 11/16/2016 4:09 PM, Steve Hay wrote:
> On 15 November 2016 at 09:26, Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with
>> Apache 2.4 and requested a change.  Given that we haven't released an
>> updated apreq in nearly 6 years, I'm inclined to make/test the changes
>> to the test suite and immediately go to a release cycle.
>>
>> Does anyone want time to add anything else to libapreq-2.14 before I
>> start tarring and voting (in the next few days, I hope)?
>>
> 
> All looks good here on Win32 - the current SVN version passes all
> tests using VC++ 2010, perl-5.25.3, mod_perl-2.0.10 and either
> httpd-2.2.31 or httpd-2.4.23. (Whatever the httpd-2.4 incompatibility
> was seems not to affect anything on Win32!)
>