Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0F3200B16 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:19:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 59CA9160A55; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A1F2D160A24 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:19:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 21165 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2016 12:19:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 21155 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2016 12:19:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:19:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 211B9180481 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:19:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.651 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.651 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mw2Q7hSfZraL for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.166]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1D0E65FAF4 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-po-13v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.237]) by resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id Ey9xbugUOa1eGEyAUbQ5n2; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:19:06 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1466425146; bh=2NuPpWivntqLq4H1o7Mz0DOJUHFMGeR0xLS8xWNSbMQ=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=o3c+Ly2a17KXN5Woi1od60mO8goCTarLW5KIVuy7LDP0KC9IXa6vLFvvbaiMk9SYa opJdN2a5vtwXgdEtucjopOAsUfLNhUWBY4VHSqkxJ/e0H8/D/udlnk7990sNKS1Im6 RVICZ82QlxSf+Z/uQvSWo+xA+n3TguNPwkAFM7UXl0LwmwB1cr34w12nm60C3/jduR 04OGdtk3TOOufvhFt4uPKNv7kAkC14XztInHhRlCWRT1UFzDBKVY8cMF3OvTTn2GLA 3cgeVHZzZv58WdV5CK9nsE8qeNAH1hoLs9mxkahcNkSRJuhR8RFOz2WW9a0c20HV+9 Wx7qdj45VjWHw== Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.84.114]) by resomta-po-13v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 90K51t0012U0RYt010K5Q8; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:19:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.21 as GA From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: <0E764C53-C273-44BE-95F3-D8021A47F298@apachelounge.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:19:04 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4658F526-4554-47E1-A9A6-C2CC66088E84@jaguNET.com> References: <284E5DFF-1250-442A-AEC5-91D3C6B9D990@greenbytes.de> <9E843C6B-DB81-4693-8B05-A4F4794EC1A7@greenbytes.de> <0E764C53-C273-44BE-95F3-D8021A47F298@apachelounge.com> To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) archived-at: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:19:19 -0000 Yes, I am trending the same way... > On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Steffen wrote: >=20 > Is a regression. Better to have the fix in GA.=20 >=20 >> Op 20 jun. 2016 om 13:51 heeft Stefan Eissing = het volgende geschreven: >>=20 >> Yes. Everything else is +1. Just this. Just wanted to express that I = do not see it as blocking, but am not happy about it either. >>=20 >>> Am 20.06.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski : >>>=20 >>> Although not required, I am curious about the +0 vote. Is it >>> due totally to the non-release breaking bug? (the one fixed >>> w/ the 'h2_beam_abort(stream->input);' line added to h2_mplx.c) ? >>>=20 >>>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Stefan Eissing = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Tested: >>>> (15.5.0 Darwin): event, prefork, worker >>>> (14.04.1-Ubuntu, x86_64): event, worker=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Vote: +0 >>>>=20 >>>> The bug discovered by Michael Kaufmann is not release breaking for = me. If we'd find another issue, I would bring in the fix. >>>>=20 >>>> -Stefan >>>>=20 >>>>> Am 16.06.2016 um 19:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski : >>>>>=20 >>>>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found >>>>> at the usual place: >>>>>=20 >>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>>>>=20 >>>>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA. >>>>>=20 >>>>> [ ] +1: Good to go >>>>> [ ] +0: meh >>>>> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs. >>>>>=20 >>>>> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thx! >>=20 >=20