httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] on TRACE & RFC compliance
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:08:08 GMT
The wording change seems fine to me, I'd actually be fine with simply
dropping
your last sentence entirely. Our config defaults speak for themselves.

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote:

> We had a couple of people complaining about the language around TRACE in
> the docs, which say disabling TRACE "makes your server noncompliant", a
> claim I found hard to support.
>
> All methods but HEAD and GET are defined as OPTIONAL, so I'm not sure
> how this is true, am I missing something?
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-5.1.1
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-4.1
>
> Is that choice of words just to scare people off?  IIRC there are some
> pretty strong opinions on this; attached is how I'd change it.
>

Mime
View raw message