httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1750779 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c
Date Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:38:02 GMT
We now set exactly the same callback right before in line 709. If we had more than one callback,
we would not have to specify NULL, but restore any previous callback there was, right?

But that is all just theoretical, as You and Yann already stated.

> Am 30.06.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Yann Ylavic <ylavic.dev@gmail.com>:
> 
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Is there a reson why we use ssl_callback_SSLVerify instead of NULL like we do in
asimilar situation below?
>> IMHO we do not want to change the callback here to whatever it may set.
>> I agree that in practice there won't be any difference right now, since we only have
one callback.
> 
> I agree that if/when we have multiple callback possibilities, we
> should set NULL here, but also above where we force the new mode.
> 
> Nothing to worry about for now, though.
> 
> Regards,
> Yann.


Mime
View raw message