Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4217F200828 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 12:14:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 4110F16099F; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AE591602C0 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 12:14:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 56493 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2016 10:14:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 56483 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2016 10:14:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 443B31A05AC for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=visualsvn.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmWZvB__oOwM for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com (mail-io0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 731B55F3F4 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 190so126923178iow.1 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:14:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=visualsvn.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fgH4JiULAY+41X8LJq1gxJM3nyhkh53cl4MxqGmBYi8=; b=A2W/pQFdP9eQ0RVb1F36co5WPnu5U9QhmFNHxvwTt8ZRwB/JODENJXxF75SfQWRg3F m/lNo5v0hrHMOEbGU4Gdpll42oDRAwYndqbKDOJjaqDSkpPgMlzGlKSiAqIEGB/J2YOL eRZTUCnsjC331WmhnA7zE9VUCgY289zOroYu4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=fgH4JiULAY+41X8LJq1gxJM3nyhkh53cl4MxqGmBYi8=; b=UGE7hbELrQ2v4l1nZbCXkHBiYzkpVUI0E7c8FNbYVUKqP2aKQ9Jl58KY9mwndy0jKx iYriCu1CncPu/te3qfC9uvkVA+uwuctYzxpQohkY1Yge2wfNKx+U9//W4v5E4/6Gp0mp gLuo7NvLEcbVU3AOpL4C71tosgS5ZnIoHS9EtKounRi8Bl/bnKTnHed77sez7/LgH1NQ GrbnKH/0FrvRHQibxNfQW1yJr3KDfvIYkcfyVBfbP1W1jYLsJR7IavxILHORifkFyzMd dMmUy0cHLGKF9+8+GWWRZ5YHtOJZQE3qWtRRzTgDffdywwXlV2AgfCM95SbimrbHQItP itTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVlyGDU6qQlrRBYPebA0liTlkZsm/Lu0R93+qs85+zSIwNudkWGN+BsTsHRyCmt2+on6m3bFhwF6v2S9OWG X-Received: by 10.36.37.16 with SMTP id g16mr1228949itg.58.1463134439094; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:13:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.176.231 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:13:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <89AFC980-E773-41EE-B095-C5C251B065AC@greenbytes.de> References: <89AFC980-E773-41EE-B095-C5C251B065AC@greenbytes.de> From: Evgeny Kotkov Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 13:13:39 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mod_rewrite: support proxying via mod_proxy_http2 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:05 -0000 Stefan Eissing writes: > Hmm, can someone with more brains than me on mod_rewrite look at the > first patch if we want to add handling for h2: and h2c: uri schemes > here or if there is a better way? Thanks. In case this will help the review, here are some of the existing changes that target similar problems (mod_rewrite not picking up a new scheme for proxy URLs). I examined them prior to preparing the patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1528556 https://svn.apache.org/r405625 https://svn.apache.org/r124584 Regards, Evgeny Kotkov