Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFFC2009C5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 21:38:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CAAC8160A16; Mon, 16 May 2016 19:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 203E8160131 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 21:38:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 97813 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2016 19:38:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97803 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2016 19:38:21 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2016 19:38:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BBD9D180536 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 19:38:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g-3_C07DUqOC for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 19:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s1.mail.rcig.net (s1.mail.rcig.net [216.87.38.201]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DEC965F5CB for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 19:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 23-117-14-203.lightspeed.stlsmo.sbcglobal.net ([23.117.14.203]:63051 helo=[192.168.0.2]) by s1.mail.rcig.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1b2OLB-0004Yf-HA for dev@httpd.apache.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 14:38:13 -0500 Subject: Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport To: dev@httpd.apache.org References: <32aed3d3b08d0b93308f0698a831ebf3@primary.net> From: Daniel Ruggeri Message-ID: <74145195-1ecd-214f-0dd4-8839544e47b7@primary.net> Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 14:37:43 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: X-The email account used to send this email was: druggeri@primary.net archived-at: Mon, 16 May 2016 19:38:23 -0000 On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so > would be I believe I heard and/or used the term "sexy" at least once to describe it ;-) On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Hmmm... The balancer-manager page does display the configured > values for 'hcpasses' and 'hcfails' as well as the current count > of passes/fails. Is that sufficient? Yeah - didn't think about that. It'd be fine for my purposes. It could be a PITA if someone is monitoring for a specific string like "transitive" or "fail", but it's probably not worth monkeying with. -- Daniel Ruggeri