httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Jagielski"<...@apache.org>
Subject Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport
Date Wed, 18 May 2016 14:25:25 GMT
Seems like adding that directly to the module itself makes the most sense. Later versions
will allow for using Provider API to make it easier to add various checks,

On 2016-05-17 05:17, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de> wrote: 
> Jim,
> 
> how do you see the possibility of other proxy modules providing their own hc? HTTP/2
has this nice PING frame that is intended for exactly this.
> 
> Cheers,
>  Stefan
> 
> PS. Btw. it's accepted for backport, left the actual work for you...
> 
> > Am 17.05.2016 um 12:41 schrieb Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com>:
> > 
> > 
> >> On May 16, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <DRuggeri@primary.net> wrote:
> >> 
> >> On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>> THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so
> >>> would be
> >> 
> >> I believe I heard and/or used the term "sexy" at least once to describe
> >> it ;-)
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>> Hmmm... The balancer-manager page does display the configured
> >>> values for 'hcpasses' and 'hcfails' as well as the current count
> >>> of passes/fails. Is that sufficient?
> >> 
> >> Yeah - didn't think about that. It'd be fine for my purposes. It could
> >> be a PITA if someone is monitoring for a specific string like
> >> "transitive" or "fail", but it's probably not worth monkeying with.
> >> 
> > 
> > Yeah... let's mull this over and see what makes the most sense.
> > 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message