Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54E0F1913F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 23:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93595 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2016 23:26:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 93541 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2016 23:26:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 93531 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2016 23:26:28 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 23:26:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9BE9AC0D64 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 23:25:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rG69Jm3NQxSv for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 23:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com (mail-io0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CC2F45F39D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 23:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 2so149227347ioy.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:25:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=PEa3sxoCtZJVAeYuk7WH8CeI1i3VpPehAgG+Nux9MiY=; b=jjjuEMAV1VqRjBEzg7FmmNDdo0YdDHUGl/mtNcjLY0a9+VPxnoS5yp46WezcEoXyDI 7Y7psh48T/WS9gj78uEAIhjp8dbS78TyGh9cHdN/zFS/S/rmZM6JhUuGCc1j6yMrr3j1 wrVDsOswv92VY0/euZGEP3VzqfIAkOdReq4nmsOxfPV+XhfaKd4pDqXcSsFKVAT/C3J8 +w25PSVOewb1a54lh1JOX5zPFmIj1tluM4560HtbcceaZ05wWFP5ICyctOdg72bR/Q3e WB2RvqZxKIrMOiGE39518R6kXxcKl+qY8y3zVjvnPbxuicyz7ZqsiUXWKDxQOn0Q4OWo oR4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=PEa3sxoCtZJVAeYuk7WH8CeI1i3VpPehAgG+Nux9MiY=; b=K/0VkxaTrHpn1HwXLuwuKg4JE6s5R6lCXxKwbyvlRHmJJwh4vwgpER5dxIhawyyRiO dgw8ZVhBVKeReLCbK8lPeC4Dlj4yRMnRFyNBcNSdfIzLMrrk9PJ7O1UVFnGo0LOmLqJP C+1ENeypb3Gk8dnDNo3Xp6xbE+m+ltIlEjXRuxnQxKvF/acI3jLxffZ6RZOy0Xbqn65O LqmFcoeT9dFbqQ+fOB/WdEGMCsZYEtG1zFB5mX+JgEkTyE9xKhuCo8WduABDp0SwjcYk zyzfdfpeIKil8IGXABFMD/Gx30t2WIL5XmPqCNjjAvenQk6HsAw74HwgYC/cCjfV0Jia hSTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIZvxV+Jl7t4Meb4wT7XJ6FRCj9aG0bvZuDjbvm5mk+H+cgfhkSeHT55E4twaTX0aCPX04gmqlRXXMKXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.25.139 with SMTP id 133mr12521143ioz.90.1460157942869; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.39.16 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160408195219.951A73A022C@svn01-us-west.apache.org> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:25:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r1738292 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS From: Eric Covener To: Apache HTTP Server Development List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:32 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > It was working, in the sense that it had the intended effect (the [un]define > took effect) in the broader global context. > > This is a breaking change to some potentially existing configs, however > misguided they are, which is the sort of thing we've avoided in the released > branch. > > Could we log an error rather than preventing startup? One issue is that > these directives are encountered prior to opening the error log file. One > possible fix would be to have a second directive handler with the sole > purpose of emitting errors, running at the normal processing scope, and > not within exec_on_read. This seems to work inside a directive handler on unix and ends up in the console: ap_log_perror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_STARTUP, 0, cmd->pool > > This shouldn't be allowed to fester on trunk, obviously, but for 2.4 it > seems > like something we shouldn't alter, no matter how much it frustrates users > who used this unintentionally. That's fair, I don't remember if I intentionally or unintentionally didn't propose it immediately.