Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: Steffen <info@apachelounge.com>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:39:50 +0100
Message-ID: <56f28086.c6c.580.1708@land10.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_SW_30970_1458733190_mpa="

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_SW_30970_1458733190_mpa=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed


Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my 
time) I can build.

Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try.

When I look to the changes, it should build.


On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you?
>
> THX!!
>
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>
>> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe 
>> does not break a .dsp build.
>>
>> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not 
>> usable, which is not true.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>>>>>
>>>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>>>>>
>>>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the 
>>>>> issue ?
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 
>>>> /
>>>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the
>>>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd 
>>>> on
>>>> Windows.
>>>
>>> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not?
>>>
>>> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not
>>> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work),
>>> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.
>>> Why would that break dsp files?
>>
>>
>


------=_SW_30970_1458733190_mpa=
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style>
 .sw_message P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}
 .sw_message {FONT-SIZE: 12pt;FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;background:white;}
 .sw_message blockquote{margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;border-left:2px solid #144fae;color: #144fae;}
 .sw_message blockquote blockquote{border-left:2px solid #006312;color: #006312;}
 .sw_message blockquote blockquote blockquote{border-left:2px solid #8e5656;color: #8e5656;}
 .sw_message blockquote blockquote blockquote blockquote{border-left:2px solid #888;color: #888;}
</style>
</head>
<body class=3d"sw_message">
<div>Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my ti=
me) I can build.</div><div><br></div><div>Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give =
it a .dsp try.</div><div><br></div><div>When I look to the changes, it shoul=
d build.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div id=3d"edit=
or_signature"></div><div>On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski  wr=
ote: </div><blockquote type=3d"cite">Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2=
.4 builds for you?<br><br>THX!!<br><br><blockquote type=3d"cite"> On Mar 23,=
 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen &lt;info@apachelounge.com&gt; wrote:<br> <br> Ind=
eed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does not=
 break a .dsp build.<br> <br> My attention was just the statement of wrowe t=
hat .dsp files are not usable, which is not true.<br> <br> <br>&nbsp;&nbsp; =
 <br> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote: <br><blockquote t=
ype=3d"cite"> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt &lt;phpdev@ehrh=
ardt.nl&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote type=3d"cite"> Steffen in gmane.comp.apach=
e.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):<br><blockquote type=3d"cite"> Saw=
 that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.<br> <br> The commen=
t says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.<br> <br> I can tell that =
they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ?<br></blockquote>=
 <br> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 =
/<br> VC14 &amp; x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the<=
br> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd on=
<br> Windows.<br></blockquote> <br> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files =
still work or not?<br> <br> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite l=
imited), Bill did not<br> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr =
which did not work),<br> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.<br> Why w=
ould that break dsp files?<br></blockquote> <br> <br></blockquote><br></bloc=
kquote><br>
</body></html>

------=_SW_30970_1458733190_mpa=--