httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>
Subject Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.
Date Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:26:36 GMT
Thanks, Steffen!

> Am 23.03.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Steffen <info@apachelounge.com>:
> 
> I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues. 
> 
> Build with SVN revision 1736328.
> 
> Running looks also fine sofar.
> 
>  
>  
> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski wrote: 
>> Thx... I would like to T&R today if possible, because I was hoping
>> for a release by the end of this week, but I also don't want to
>> have to punt 2.4.20 as well, so we should wait.
>> 
>>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my time) I
can build.
>>> 
>>> Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try.
>>> 
>>> When I look to the changes, it should build.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>     
>>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski wrote: 
>>>> Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you?
>>>> 
>>>> THX!!
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe
does not break a .dsp build.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not
usable, which is not true.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>        
>>>>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote: 
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>
wrote:
>>>>>>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45
+0100):
>>>>>>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What
was the issue ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9
/ VC11 /
>>>>>>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented
that the
>>>>>>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build
httpd on
>>>>>>> Windows.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did
not
>>>>>> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work),
>>>>>> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.
>>>>>> Why would that break dsp files?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message