httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.
Date Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:30:39 GMT
OK, thanks for clarifying Steffen.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does
> not break a .dsp build.
>
> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not usable,
> which is not true.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>
> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>
> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>
> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>
> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ?
>
>
> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 /
> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the
> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd on
> Windows.
>
>
> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not?
>
> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not
> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work),
> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.
> Why would that break dsp files?
>
>

Mime
View raw message