httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>
Subject Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.
Date Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:12:34 GMT

I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues.

Build with SVN revision 1736328.

Running looks also fine sofar.




On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> Thx... I would like to T&R today if possible, because I was hoping
> for a release by the end of this week, but I also don't want to
> have to punt 2.4.20 as well, so we should wait.
>
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my 
>> time) I can build.
>>
>> Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try.
>>
>> When I look to the changes, it should build.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you?
>>>
>>> THX!!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe 
>>>> does not break a .dsp build.
>>>>
>>>> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not 
>>>> usable, which is not true.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>

>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was
the 
>>>>>>> issue ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 /
VC11 
>>>>>> /
>>>>>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that
the
>>>>>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd

>>>>>> on
>>>>>> Windows.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not?
>>>>>
>>>>> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not
>>>>> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work),
>>>>> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.
>>>>> Why would that break dsp files?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message