httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>
Subject Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.
Date Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:39:50 GMT

Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my 
time) I can build.

Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try.

When I look to the changes, it should build.




On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you?
>
> THX!!
>
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>
>> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe 
>> does not break a .dsp build.
>>
>> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not 
>> usable, which is not true.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>>>>>
>>>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>>>>>
>>>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the 
>>>>> issue ?
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 
>>>> /
>>>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the
>>>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd 
>>>> on
>>>> Windows.
>>>
>>> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not?
>>>
>>> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not
>>> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work),
>>> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.
>>> Why would that break dsp files?
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message