httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.
Date Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:36:36 GMT
Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you?

THX!!

> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
> 
> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does not break
a .dsp build.
> 
> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not usable, which is
not true.
> 
> 
>  
> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote: 
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>>>> 
>>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>>>> 
>>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue
?
>>> 
>>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 /
>>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the
>>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd on
>>> Windows.
>> 
>> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not?
>> 
>> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not
>> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work),
>> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.
>> Why would that break dsp files?
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message