httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <>
Subject AW: motorz
Date Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:08:21 GMT

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jim Jagielski []
> Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2016 23:51
> An:
> Betreff: Re: motorz
> The more I think of it, the more I think we should just
> remove motorz and simple from trunk... Or keep them around
> but not really worry about them.
> The fun and interesting stuff is already in event, and although
> it might be nice to, for example, move the worker_pool stuff
> to a simply apr_thread_pool, I wonder what it buys us, if
> anything.

I guess APRisation has its benefits (but its drawbacks as well, due to the stricter
versioning rules over there), but I guess we can do this iteratively
with event. Nevertheless it might be good to keep motorz and simple
around even if dormant to keep the ideas for these steps on the table.
As you sound that you don't feel these steps are all too sexy for doing them
they might be for someone else. Probably if someone can define them more
clearly a project for GSOC?



View raw message