httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl>
Subject RE: 2.4 pause - mod_http2 patchset Upgrade h2c vs mod_ssl Upgradetls
Date Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:27:49 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de]
> Sent: dinsdag 8 december 2015 10:43
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 2.4 pause - mod_http2 patchset Upgrade h2c vs mod_ssl
> Upgradetls


> If Apache accepts body lengths of up to 64KB (or something configurable)
> and some other server implements 8K and some third 1MB, how will that
> help design of a client that, for some reason, *wants* an upgrade to
> succeed?

For Subversion this would make a 100% difference.

Currently all true Subversion servers are implemented via httpd.


Upgrade to h2c is currently not interesting for webbrowsers as all of them
have decided not to implement it... But it makes a huge difference for web
applications that talk to specific servers.

Which is very similar to that TLS upgrade that is interested for
webprinting... These usecases don't use combinations of random clients, with
random servers... They use specific combinations.

	Bert


Mime
View raw message