httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1698084 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:42:42 GMT
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On 08/27/2015 08:57 AM, jkaluza@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: jkaluza
> > Date: Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015
> > New Revision: 1698084
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1698084
> > Log:
> > Vote
> >
> > Modified:
> >     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> >
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1698084&r1=1698083&r2=1698084&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015
> > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> >          None, only 2.2.x specific
> >       Backport version for 2.2.x of patch:
> >          http://people.apache.org/~rpluem/patches/pr58267.diff
> > -     +1: rpluem,
> > +     +1: rpluem, jkaluza
>
> I know that I saw positive feedback or better +1's on the dev list and
> that this counts as well, but to ease
> documentation and to be sure that we all talked about the same I would
> like to see these +1's going in STATUS if they
> are still valid.
> I have Yann and Jim on my mind :-).
>

No need, provided we acknowledge 'Reviewed by:' in the commit message for
the backport.

Mime
View raw message