httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1698084 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:34:00 GMT


On 08/27/2015 08:57 AM, jkaluza@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jkaluza
> Date: Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015
> New Revision: 1698084
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1698084
> Log:
> Vote
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1698084&r1=1698083&r2=1698084&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>          None, only 2.2.x specific
>       Backport version for 2.2.x of patch:
>          http://people.apache.org/~rpluem/patches/pr58267.diff
> -     +1: rpluem,
> +     +1: rpluem, jkaluza
>  
>  
>  PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
> 
> 
> 

I know that I saw positive feedback or better +1's on the dev list and that this counts as
well, but to ease
documentation and to be sure that we all talked about the same I would like to see these +1's
going in STATUS if they
are still valid.
I have Yann and Jim on my mind :-).

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Mime
View raw message