Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF47918589 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40329 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2015 17:00:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 40261 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2015 17:00:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 40251 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2015 17:00:17 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:00:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B5843D6B6C for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:00:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id otPS8i7p0lb6 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com (mail-ig0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C48CB43E3E for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpg9 with SMTP id pg9so138219458igb.0 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lYNqtGLKmkxamhYIqtw4/D8X8l785s44n7z1axwOsW8=; b=b2L6yH1MRFc297G5AaeITWlQ6ecvhpkaT5CE35vP+VjbjMQPp08bH91eadcH6+ecpo 5YBHerdfHkNmv18yBreBcA4knM2cPnWo48H2zpQzOh4DvHQha0Cz5j2jNuoK6S1S3fmc Y7ffwJhjaho95UkhRBY7S0oNngcgbEh5YGN0K5RD2o1gHe7/xqriJw4XQGmoQG9rCPdm Zoah+MczXBlF8NKRegQgAToXF8VX503NiM9KbAeqNU5YaY/fwsWXYOToFkrMnn3Y1l/V AKu6tHZh/cL92T+YTUalNfuVPqtrnXGnsx0lRjChHgapHH+k8XiDMdZ7Q6/Z7+3wUWWV aANw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.171.228 with SMTP id ax4mr36405117igc.32.1437584402422; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.26.197 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9FCEAABD-8772-4289-8E54-CD0FD984C7E7@greenbytes.de> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: httpd Protocols proposal From: Yann Ylavic To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > So, a RUN_ALL that collects willing protocols pre_select, a ALL for post_select post_select is to announce the selected one, right? That looks good to me. > and a FIRST for switch? Isn't the core doing the switch itself, after post_select?