Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BA6A18EFF for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90334 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2015 11:59:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 90266 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2015 11:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 90256 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2015 11:59:45 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:59:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 08492D3036 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:59:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NASMEa2nxOa7 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 74A8043DF5 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieru20 with SMTP id u20so10279983ier.0 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 04:59:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4EuBt0uklZYEXfctNE13nvgZ1B2WwiQGBh7D9MsLpGU=; b=hv8db+lT7w8jJHJXSdDVBGvplG/kimfGtRlq/7w27wk9906SnSCgR9SMSU1+YNluaD SQ+t+sRU3dMtrg+Ubfm0dRJLKD906+EMD4x+E/Gue5x2sjVjyiX7c67nlqaPSmUvetiC 60/M6hXTBl3CMcn84hNQt2B+Ge4NToQCCQE/8zilXdGkJdu2uWcp5YOK/+mdZSZVAJSF +w67hgKcEWSpcQ1DMsL7OM5SX4vfFHvCyRRh4HdUzR6hl0BeAgNnTT0zg6nssdTWa3+f xr0EXCQeoIZYLOagGAuOCpIVtiBXA5ODFyiE5YsARVmwUSzKiYQsZUD9IYqHdnB+3s0J VaGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.112.73 with SMTP id io9mr90448538igb.18.1436356778117; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 04:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.75.70 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 04:59:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:59:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Showstoppers From: Yann Ylavic To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:16 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > 2.4 still needs one reviewer to make the decision so we can have a 2.4, at > last. I voted the revert, applied accepted backports, and updated tests framework accordingly. I guess both 2.4.16 and 2.2.30 could be T&R now. However maybe the proposed backport about mod_reqtimeout (PR 56729) is worth being included too, but that's not a showstopper. It somehow made his way through 2.2.30 already (r1678698) but for 2.4.x this partial fix isn't enough (due to EOR handling). Would be nice if it could be reviewed on time (my only vote so far...).