Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACsi251WwRMVGNNGuxv5eP9a6DbS+JxYa=1nwqNUPydaZcEG8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150609154102.4F8F5AC006B@hades.apache.org>
	<CACsi251WwRMVGNNGuxv5eP9a6DbS+JxYa=1nwqNUPydaZcEG8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 18:13:31 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAKQ1sVMHR8xpkNW+Dcc8J3xUGZodZZcBSRN-S-96VnpgJ+EbwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1684457 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
From: Yann Ylavic <ylavic.dev@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:46 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> I don't entirely understand the patch CHANGES, however...
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:41 AM, <wrowe@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>  PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>>    [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
>>
>>     * mod_ssl: bring SNI behavior into better conformance with RFC 6066
>>       (also addresses PR 56241)
>>       trunk patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1585090
>>                    (partial, w/o startup warnings changes)
>>       2.4.x patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1588424
>>                    (backported to 2.4.10)
>>       2.2.x patch:
>> http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.2.x-no_sni_warning.patch
>> +     +1: ylavic, jorton, wrowe
>
>
> The patch claims both adjusting alerts and changing startup behavior...

The CHANGES entry is, but not the patch (and STATUS entry), as per:

>>       trunk patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1585090
>>                    (partial, w/o startup warnings changes)

above.

>
> Everything else is commentary.  When you backport, Yann, would you correct
> the message?

Done in r1684462.
Thanks for noticing.