Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4100718016 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27316 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2015 16:44:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 27245 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2015 16:44:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 27235 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2015 16:44:42 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:44:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5DBC7CB6AC for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:44:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.001 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdpdlqDpaJjt for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 370F3275E3 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iesa3 with SMTP id a3so40194693ies.2 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R8Eb4cdIhQ3d90ujOQ3zpRpCxBOwKU4s/7pN6oKgXTo=; b=DeJ4WJD3tcVExeRmGhKk2DxUrdNm7emYMM93PBELRWoTBrjM9no6vxd5hHX6A+OBPm 0IvtVUglzdWQJT/xzx0C8HG1MCc62OJ0BLzMUSaRORlaKyA86z8JhiiU5l3dec7EtT9M oDHqaLVVDXnO/wi2l0h+fb13RkpF2DRcet/LnIsfcUsszpVWtZrlz4eiwxEZeDSKbMr+ 4vrGGffAzqIHER9q6blrKBLX3uMUlBi+reuM5K0LLsPZMzqNLgBu7U28vNtlCq+iQX8q 0Cj7nxfHQvgtyCfzoslaKaCBerHgJUn2udm8Xc8HMuqG2fZ7/d8s39v29Fcij7KRXklY lqgw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/rBq3LBTdWpqB5j0gh5OUiTf3gHM4P4ciwPDGM4IkOptFnFbxf+6Y4VFhglAPSDtNF+Id MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.90.179 with SMTP id bx19mr35353610igb.43.1433436223493; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.190.195 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [76.252.112.72] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:43:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: T&R of 2.2.13 [corresponding to Re: T&R of 2.4.13] From: William A Rowe Jr To: httpd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea4294e8f7d90517b3e0a8 --047d7bea4294e8f7d90517b3e0a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 More context at your fingertips without refreshing httpd-2.2 branch, first... https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57832 On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:26 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > [Changing subject, don't mean to hijack the 2.4 activity train] > > There is a modestly important patch, already backported to 2.4.x branch, > that is still sitting in 2.2 status. Could one more committer please > review > and vote on that remaining fix? > > Because it helps to avert an unintended doubled response in some edge > cases, I consider this one important enough to hold up 2.2 tag for some > more hours. > > Bill > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:36 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> Although there are some cool things that I'd like to see in >>> 2.4.13, I don't want to hold off any longer (plus, those >>> cool things would be good incentive for a 2.4.14 sooner >>> rather than later). >>> >>> I plan to T&R 2.4.13 on Thurs, by Noon eastern. >>> >> >> +1, planning to match you with a T&R of 2.2.30 on the same timetable. >> >> There is a nominally important last patch in 2.2 STATUS, if a third pair >> of eyes have the cycles to review it. >> > > --047d7bea4294e8f7d90517b3e0a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
More= context at your fingertips without refreshing httpd-2.2 branch, first...

https://bz.apac= he.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D57832

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:26 AM, = William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
[Changing subject, don't mean to hijack = the 2.4 activity train]

There is a modestly important p= atch, already backported to 2.4.x branch,
that is still sitting in 2.2 = status.=C2=A0 Could one more committer please review
and vote on = that remaining fix?

Because it helps to avert an u= nintended doubled response in some edge
cases, I consider this on= e important enough to hold up 2.2 tag for some=C2=A0
more hours.<= /div>

Bill


=
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:36 PM, William A Rowe J= r <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
O= n Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
Although there are some cool things that I'= ;d like to see in
2.4.13, I don't want to hold off any longer (plus, those
cool things would be good incentive for a 2.4.14 sooner
rather than later).

I plan to T&R 2.4.13 on Thurs, by Noon eastern.

+1, pla= nning to match you with a T&R of 2.2.30 on the same timetable.

There is a nom= inally important last patch in 2.2 STATUS, if a third pair of eyes have the= cycles to review it.


--047d7bea4294e8f7d90517b3e0a8--