Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F2231857F for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3462 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2015 04:48:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3398 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2015 04:48:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3388 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2015 04:48:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:48:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3CE65C94B6 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:48:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.183 X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.183 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, THIS_AD=2.183, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tktvUTzZroWo for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com (mail-ie0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6F157454F1 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iepj10 with SMTP id j10so29757419iep.3 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:48:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=667SnT57is068mZXO6bluqeI7IcL3CEQs7SF9EuWj0g=; b=A8lTJ+yV7n6Jy+y89qVTRFZ2ss6kUtyP2QduQAu5Zhgkv50z+dRApjqCbhorQjr7ff wtzzkmWVAwErGdS/4o+yJFC7nQIoHIEjNOrhPn0w6Fk6aux4q1fqIVjrmZhf+r78RRhY EXc/V1ExUTP03hQcllnol/lR3VgVjDqyAiXRJIhLpMYkLKx2AvnW+NWBKOEi7f+EGndW nanePqgHRBuleb/5/t9k45SePYg+PJaT6ajoiN1Y8qftfiWM7+pqDBWNXkzuQ7Sy6toS 4Ho3dlOHEmvae+ULB3ADBupRd7h3evdPWXVphiUBD2BV7McJPx+m0z+EQgEW25YiEiMQ 3swA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmEX4C0XBMIXkn0QQ1elPU1mRTgwsc4S9+fz0npR6vbWIHe2C6hLxgMjKgATi4bLctaPVb MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.164.6 with SMTP id n6mr1078287ioe.54.1432788481247; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.190.195 with HTTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:48:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [76.252.112.72] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 23:48:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Simplified 2.2.x EOL Decision From: William A Rowe Jr To: httpd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141f5f676b06105171d105e --001a1141f5f676b06105171d105e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Choose one; > > [ ] EOL the 2.2.x branch effective 5/31/16; strictly security releases to > that date > [X] Defer a 2.2.x EOL decision for 6 months and re-consider this proposal > in Nov, '15. > Enough of this ad-hominem BS... this is in fact a majority rule decision (it is a vote not on code but on procedure), and is binding on the project as a whole. I don't want to discuss this again for six months and I'm not keen on the smug little trolls telling me what I should and should not be working on at a project that I participate at. --001a1141f5f676b06105171d105e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, May 27, 2015 at 11:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net= > wrote:
Choose one;

[ ] EOL the 2.2.x branch effective 5/31/16; strictly= security releases to that date
[X] Defer a 2.2.x EOL decision fo= r 6 months and re-consider this proposal in Nov, '15.

Enough of this ad-hominem BS... this is in fact = a majority rule decision (it is a vote
not on code but on procedu= re), and is binding on the project as a whole.=C2=A0 I don't
<= div>want to discuss this again for six months and I'm not keen on the s= mug little
trolls telling me what I should and should not be work= ing on at a project that
I participate at.

--001a1141f5f676b06105171d105e--