Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Subject: Re: 2.2 and 2.4 and 2.6/3.0
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKUrXK4u+UX8aAzejGs_D_4qXZai2UhaN7ct2opO7HnKB-F1cA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:09:41 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2DBF5013-F193-4EE6-BCBB-98BBABB95C3C@jaguNET.com>
References: <C1DFA0D6-3371-476A-A1CF-D594155CBFE3@jaguNET.com>
 <CACsi251Yfu8G6w4Rq-B02sQgG1g47_r7VNfhAZEmL58BMR+Yaw@mail.gmail.com>
 <B1C39B8A-D303-4F01-8BE6-16A938C20770@jaguNET.com>
 <CAKUrXK7GiHOC=0U90Q31LkfFJsBNz6NBPfNvsgAa0=LKMs+8Dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3B5B5636-7EAB-4EC6-A1C9-8B541B3CAA8C@jaguNET.com>
 <CAKUrXK4u+UX8aAzejGs_D_4qXZai2UhaN7ct2opO7HnKB-F1cA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org

>=20
> one thing it means is having compelling stories involving the latest =
hot tech that use 2.4
>=20
> basically, any time there is a how-to-FOO somewhere on the www that =
uses nginx for the web server component, there needs to be a better =
how-to-FOO that uses httpd 2.4 ;)  (I don't even think 2.2 is an issue =
here)
>=20

Agreed. Plus the fact that nginx is really open core, and
being heavily promoted and marketed by nginx.com, does put
httpd, as a "real" open source project at some disadvantage.

We should ping Sally for some thoughts. Also, I know that
we could likely get a monthly column from opensource.com
(or every other month) to help w/ combating the FUD.