httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.2 and 2.4 and 2.6/3.0
Date Wed, 27 May 2015 14:42:33 GMT
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:

> Anyone else think it's time to EOL 2.2 and focus
> on 2.4 and the next gen? My thoughts are that http/2
> and mod_h2 will drive the trunk design efforts and so
> it would be nice to focus energy on 2.4 and later...
>

People here focus their energy on whatever they want.  It takes a small
number of people to keep a stable branch going (technically 3, but in
practice a slightly higher number).  Instead of the group choosing EOL or
only-security-fixes-of-some-minimal-severity or something else for a stable
branch based on what many people think is interesting to them for whatever
reason, I think that the project should limit its concern to ensuring that
the community understands the state of the branch and that it is EOL-ed
when a sufficient number of people don't care.

What we need to know for the 2.2.x branch is basically this:

Developers (committers or not):

[  ] I am willing to help resolve security issues in the 2.2.x branch.
[  ] I am willing to help address non-security issues in the 2.2.x branch.

PMC members:

[  ] I am willing to test and vote on proposed 2.2.x releases.

Maybe this comes up to the same answer, maybe not.

(This is not a call for vote; I'm suggesting a very different mindset
towards 2.2.x from "nice to focus energy on" and "time to EOL 2.2 and focus
on".)

-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/

Mime
View raw message