httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Platform specific CTR/RTC?
Date Fri, 22 May 2015 14:57:01 GMT
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:

> I think Bill's main point is that other than himself and
> gsmith, nobody else tests on MS/Win.


There might be others who test when something seems appropriate to them and
they have time ;)


> I tried, but I never got
> even to the point of getting it to even compile/build much
> less to a point where I could *test* :)
>
>
> > On May 22, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 22 May 2015 01:51:49 -0500
> > William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> It might be worth mentioning that it's been in production for about 3-4
> >> years or so, and only was delayed in 2.2 due to the unavoidable drift
> >> between trunk/2.4 and 2.2 flavors.  We already included the
> >> ported-afterwards functionality in the previous 2.4.12 release, with
> >> apparently no issues.  The patch below is actually the origin of the
> >> enhancement.
> >
> > In those circumstances it seems not so much CTR or RTC but rather
> > commonsense to go ahead.  Don't we have a bit of a history of
> > struggling to meet RTC criteria on Windows-specific backports?
> >
> > I wonder if there's a case for formally adopting a lazy-consensus
> > policy based on what wrowe is doing here?  If a proposal has sat in
> > STATUS for a qualifying period, without attracting comment/
> > reservations, but also without attracting sufficient review +1s,
> > should it be eligible for lazy-consensus backport?
> > The proponent posts here on a "speak now or forever hold your peace"
> > basis, and goes ahead if no discussion calls it into question.
> >
> > --
> > Nick Kew
>
>


-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/

Mime
View raw message