Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FD6017D57 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57705 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2015 20:00:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 57651 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2015 20:00:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 57641 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2015 20:00:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:00:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wrowe@rowe-clan.net designates 209.85.213.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.182] (HELO mail-ig0-f182.google.com) (209.85.213.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:59:56 +0000 Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so60659724igb.0 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:57:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1xWLjicRRSuiroGYxQa1JNdubwk0e4qqBXEjoP83vVg=; b=bPAHMVyVQb0HE43jYQR5+EjGBc7sqxWt7+kT48WUyW6SmWL0M3ycjxIKzwWh61L0zt SECnfls2uxnoJuTVqkL822vzSGQW954n46isQXAaghIaXr4B6dPbXRm8Lq/uOzvVvVKE w3eyQ4m/4bk4y+HD5aVp4dg6D7xCjhSBd47j7LSrRcndGW9jnGayVW7HWQRLlfywcA1o LDkn8WMLqi2cX3LY1fd37XwTGnpo6mQzKwAsu5mwmSnGX9dMRU311EhRDZM4+LZ2q0YR Uyb7YaiTLQ9PT7ZnBIwsGTC+PFVZV3agbOUE+2EzHprbJN2DpZxUxmOcAVBRK2AdNRXR AN9A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYiolJRreUcbD/XE83d4DGotgYxfCPXwQVy0wD0mS5Qe6T6XGbSLFw3M6YltLWcFB2CsmO MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.90.179 with SMTP id bx19mr8030273igb.43.1429214240166; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.136.17 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:57:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2602:304:cfc7:480:c06e:b9:80d0:9dec] In-Reply-To: <552F3D9C.7010401@velox.ch> References: <20150415163613.GC15209@fintan.stsp.name> <552F3D9C.7010401@velox.ch> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:57:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namespacing in mod_ssl From: William A Rowe Jr To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea429417e20e0513dcdf09 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bea429417e20e0513dcdf09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 15.04.2015 18:36, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > However, the actual issue here is that mod_ssl is squatting the SSL_ > namespace. > > Historically this may have made sense (it seems mod_ssl and OpenSSL have > > shared history/authors). Bill Rowe suggested to try moving mod_ssl's > > functions into the ap_ namespace to avoid such clashes in the future. > > Agreed that mod_ssl should avoid stepping into the SSL_* yard. As > pointed out by Jeff, ap_* is fairly foreign in the mod_ssl case, though, > and my preference is for s/SSL_/ssl_/ for functions and > s/SSL_/MODSSL_/ for constants (in the latter case, there's actually > quite some more stuff lurking - SSL_OPT_*, SSL_PROTOCOL_* etc.). > +1 --047d7bea429417e20e0513dcdf09 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --047d7bea429417e20e0513dcdf09--