Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81AF31878A for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84599 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2015 21:53:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 84519 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2015 21:53:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 84508 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2015 21:53:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:53:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: message received from 54.191.145.13 which is an MX secondary for dev@httpd.apache.org) Received: from [54.191.145.13] (HELO mx1-us-west.apache.org) (54.191.145.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:53:15 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CECEE24FF9 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so25499023igb.0 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:52:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8LsbtK2GfL0YvZ5r2bKpOMgd/B96BByaD3QUz6v8DH0=; b=K5vbFd7qpKR4dvsU9+VRGfh47zmWkn6+eCNxbtb51EEFlbP47Oc9sS4bCq9O1vA7W1 rD6zY3p2G+nLrLpWAKVsWNuvHDCiZFOGD6XBZKo0M8YcG/4kUVnjrxNB5nns5ZozJhuv bIa125d+aLDhfzbeckCh4rpXuOe9PuT57c745xH0JrVy00Sl9N7t6+pN53JWeznUx4BR 4BtRfzZjGArJRmsH4lVs16uNtx9FQ6PC5nZ4CvYwiS0SZMSJ384Z0O1DunMu8CTrEpt3 aALeMlYiEXL84YanDOyAiWFzOvQqIxPJ6iHoJ6uXmAWexATqVyRrl/2U0K7O+IzPHlgR pppw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmtdTBV7u/LqrZbPQtq4sSTl0KuKT+weJKhvV6ERPgcCzZQk837BlgluPl6q81a7IW6I8Dg MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.48.203 with SMTP id t11mr11637851icf.35.1430430767800; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.136.17 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:52:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2602:304:cfc7:480:222:15ff:fe0d:e6f8] Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:52:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Looking ahead to 2.4.13 / 2.2.30 From: William A Rowe Jr To: httpd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba613b90ca7e010514f81d70 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba613b90ca7e010514f81d70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:49:47 -0400 > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > BTW: Would it make sense to consider a release of 2.4.13 in April > > to coincide w/ ApacheCon? > > We've historically produced a release at the beginning of the con. > It worked really well when we would hackathon two days, then retire > to do other con stuff for the balance of the event with a new > release in the hopper looking for votes. > > I'd love to see us tag and roll releases based on our efforts > throughout the entire gathering, sometime in that following week. > I offer to T&R an update of 2.2 as well to pick up any issues we > resolve over the course of that week. > It seems that we have 2 groups of good things to come out of ApacheCon, some immediate fixes for things like BSD project efforts, some pretty straightforward defects that have been resolved... and then there's a bunch of energy about enhancements and the h2 universe. In the short term, WDYT about giving the trees a week to settle, grab the low hanging fruit and move forward for 2.4.13 and 2.2.30 end of this coming week? Guessing Jim's up for RM'ing 2.4.13, and I'm happy to T&R 2.2.30 in tandem. Concerns / observations / thoughts? Bill --90e6ba613b90ca7e010514f81d70 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net= > wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10= :49:47 -0400
Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> BTW: Would it make sense to consider a release of 2.4.13 in April<= br> > to coincide w/ ApacheCon?

We've historically produced a release at the beginning of the con.
It worked really well when we would hackathon two days, then retire
to do other con stuff for the balance of the event with a new
release in the hopper looking for votes.

I'd love to see us tag and roll releases based on our efforts
throughout the entire gathering, sometime in that following week.
I offer to T&R an update of 2.2 as well to pick up any issues we
resolve over the course of that week.

I= t seems that we have 2 groups of good things to come out of ApacheCon,
some immediate fixes for things like BSD project efforts, some pretty=
straightforward defects that have been resolved... and then ther= e's a bunch
of energy about enhancements and the h2 universe.=

In the short term, WDYT about giving the trees a = week to settle, grab the
low hanging fruit and move forward for 2= .4.13 and 2.2.30 end of this coming
week?=C2=A0 Guessing Jim'= s up for RM'ing 2.4.13, and I'm happy to T&R 2.2.30=C2=A0
=
in tandem.

Concerns / observations / thoughts= ?

Bill
--90e6ba613b90ca7e010514f81d70--