Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of joe_schaefer@yahoo.com
 designates 98.138.91.179 as permitted sender)
From: Joseph Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Was there any concrete decision on apreq?
Message-Id: <49DE903D-B66C-4417-8067-01C29DD5B89B@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:24:43 -0500
References: <54EB9183.3040008@gknw.net>
 <CALK=YjMck2QGL46L1wmByzEUCFycuA364HvZNBrDQhKYSKT8Sg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALK=YjMck2QGL46L1wmByzEUCFycuA364HvZNBrDQhKYSKT8Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dev@httpd.apache.org" <dev@httpd.apache.org>

I still want to do that just lacking tuits

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 23, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Gregg Smith <gls@gknw.net> wrote:
>> Am I missing something? Did I miss a boatload of email where any firm
>> decision was made?
> 
> 
> I don't think you have missed anything. I assume very few people have
> any clue how it's integrated/used today.  The last thing I have in my
> mail archive is joes proposal to pull the library part back out and
> make it available in a way similar to mod_ldap.