Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FE9217F6F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73559 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2015 23:07:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73480 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2015 23:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73469 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2015 23:07:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:07:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [173.201.192.106] (HELO p3plsmtpa06-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net) (173.201.192.106) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:06:53 +0000 Received: from hub ([76.252.112.72]) by p3plsmtpa06-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id lb3S1p00C1Zmh9Y01b3TgB; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:03:28 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:03:25 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." To: Steffen Cc: Subject: Re: [CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.12 as GA Message-ID: <20150128170325.0b4ab453@hub> In-Reply-To: <54c95fa6.7d0.1c50.2e63@land10.nl> References: <54c95fa6.7d0.1c50.2e63@land10.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:16:06 +0100 Steffen wrote: > There was an issue with 2.4.11 and in 2.4.12 there is nothing > mentioned in the change file what is reverted. There must be in > 2.4.11 a change which was causing a issue, and the changes from > 2.4.11 are included. So the CHANGES is not accurate. Well, they are accurate insofar as CHANGES are ever accurate, there is no policy to include all deltas (this is what svn history is for). That said, it leaves the reader puzzled, so I've updated CHANGES in the 2.4 branch of subversion to read; Changes with Apache 2.4.13 *) Reverted behavior regression introduced in 2.4.12 (not released). Thanks for the observation.